City of York Council (Logo)

Meeting:

Audit and Governance Committee

Meeting date:

31/07/2024

Report of:

Head of Internal Audit (Veritau)

Portfolio of:

Cllr Lomas

Executive Member for Finance, Performance, Major Projects, Human Rights, Equality and Inclusion


Audit and Governance Committee Report:

Review of Effectiveness


Subject of Report

 

1.           Members are asked to consider the benefits of conducting a review of the Committee’s effectiveness, and the options for undertaking such a review.

 

Policy Basis

 

2.           The Audit and Governance Committee forms an important part of the Council’s overall framework of corporate governance, risk management and control. The Committee provides independent assurance to those charged with governance that the framework remains adequate. It also oversees the Council’s financial reporting and the preparation of the annual governance statement. As such it contributes to the effective management of the Council’s functions and services, and helps to ensure the Council is accountable to its residents, communities and stakeholders.

 

Recommendation and Reasons

 

3.           The Audit and Governance Committee is asked to:

 

-              consider whether to arrange a review of its own effectiveness and, if so, the method and timing of such review.

Reason

To ensure the committee continues to fulfil its responsibilities as set out in the Constitution and contributes to the effective operation of the Council’s corporate governance framework.  

Background

 

Overview

4.           The latest guidance on audit committees in local government, published by the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) in October 2022, recommends that audit committees should complete a periodic self-assessment of their effectiveness. Alternatively, an independent review can be undertaken. The guidance includes a checklist to support the self-assessment, enabling the Committee to highlight the areas where it has made an impact on the Council’s governance, risk management, control and audit arrangements. The outcomes of this exercise will help to support the preparation of the audit committee’s future work programme, training plans and the annual report. The exercise may also identify areas requiring changes or improvements in the Committee’s method of working or in how it communicates it activities to the Council’s leadership and wider public.

 

5.           Members views are sought on whether a review of the audit committee’s effectiveness should be completed, and if so, when such an exercise would best be undertaken. If there is support for a review, Members views are also sought on the method for undertaking the review. The options are summarised as follows:

Self-Assessment (whole committee)

 

Benefits

 

All Members will have the opportunity to contribute to the review

 

Members have a good understanding of the Council, its priorities and existing governance arrangements

 

Disadvantages

 

May lack external perspective / relevant knowledge of audit committee best practice in local government

 

Self-assessment (Member working group)

 

Benefits

 

More focussed and potentially less time consuming

 

Members have a good understanding of the Council, its priorities and existing governance arrangements

 

Disadvantages

 

May lack external perspective / relevant knowledge of audit committee best practice in local government

 

External review

 

Benefits

 

Will be seen as independent and objective

 

Offers an opportunity to learn from best practice in other local authorities and/or wider public sector

Disadvantages

 

There will be a cost (and budget implications)

 

Only limited options may be available to access relevant expertise

 

May not fully understand or reflect ‘local’ priorities or ways of working

 

6.           If Members choose to undertake a self-assessment exercise it is recommended that the review should be facilitated by officers. 

 

Consultation Analysis

 

7.           Not relevant for the purposes of this report.

 

Risks and Mitigations

 

8.           The Audit and Governance Committee will fail to comply with recommended best practice if it does not periodically undertake a review of its own effectiveness.

 

Contact details

 

For further information please contact the author of this Report.

 

Author

 

Name:

Max Thomas

Job Title:

Head of Internal Audit

Service Area:

Veritau Limited

Telephone:

01904 552940

Report approved:

Yes

Date:

4/7/2024


Background papers

 

None


Annexes

 

None